Skip to content

{ Tag Archives } history

Was Casanova a Victim?

THE world’s most notorious seducer finally has someone taking up cudgels on his behalf. British author, Judith Summers, in her controversial book, Casanova’s Women: The Great Seducer And The Women He Loved, says that the legendary flirt was a victim of Women, rather than being their exploiter!

She writes, while there were many victims among the 200 plus women he seduced, many others preyed on his generosity, his kindness and his vulnerability.”

More than two centuries after Casanova’s death, his name is still a synonym for every playboy philanderer. Says starlet Sanobar Kabir, “Casanova is the kind of man women love to hate and love at the same time.

We know Casanova to be charming, a flirt and commitment-phobic; like the modern-day casanovas around us. I am not sorry for Casanova if he was a victim. After all, it’s a man’s world, so we should be allowed a few manipulative strategies on them!”

While opinions differ about Casanova, Summers says that the swashbuckler, in fact, was not a libidinous brute. “He was a proto-feminist whose belief was that women were the equal of their men folk.

He was attracted to strong-minded women who presented him with an intellectual as well as a romantic challenge; Casanova did not pursue sex for his own sake. If he had nothing to say to a woman, he rarely wanted to sleep with her. Were he alive today, in fact, he would be a therapist’s dream patient. When he fell in love, the greatest love of his life preyed on his generosity, his vulnerability and his desire to please,” she says.

How easy is it for people to accept this theory about Casanova? It’s an interesting contradiction from what we already know about Casanova, “But should we buy these excuses? When you’re caught with your pants down repeatedly, can you be a victim? Even if we show sympathy for Casanova, that won’t change the fact that he was a philanderer. I don’t think a man can be a victim for so long.”

Interestingly, the author of the book also believes that “when Casanova was abandoned by women he adored, he’d find solace in sex”. She says, “When he fell in love, his girlfriend, Charpillon. tormented and exploited him. In public, Charpillon behaved as if she and Casanova were already lovers.

In private, she turned her head away if he so much as tried to kiss her. On the two occasions she agreed to spend the night with him, she curled up into a tight ball, making it impossible for Casanova to make love to her, and provoking him to violence, which stopped just short of rape. This cat-and-mouse behaviour left the adventurer mystified and determined to win her heart.”

Yet, the re-interpretation of Casanova’s character isn’t easily acceptable. Casanova will always be the man who was chasing women. No matter what the rationale, he’ll never be the victim.

Relationship blog is your one stop place to get all the latest news and hot gossip about love, dating, sex and relationship from all around the world.

Also tagged

A Scary Word – Ribaldry

Ribaldry is the third and somewhat neglected genre of sexual entertainments, something different from either pornography or erotica, yet is often confused with them. It could also be referred to as bawdiness or bawdry.

Unlike either pornography or erotica, which play sexual intercourse or sexual fetishes “straight”, ribaldry aims at humor. Sexual situations and titillation are presented in ribald material more for the purpose of poking fun at the foibles and weaknesses that manifest themselves in human sexuality, rather than to present sexual stimulation either simply or artistically. Also, ribaldry may use sex as a metaphor to illustrate some non-sexual concern, in which case ribaldry may verge on the territory of satire.

Like any humor, ribaldry may be read as conventional or subversive. Ribaldry typically depends on a shared background of sexual conventions and values, and its comedy generally depends on seeing those conventions broken. Depending on your attitude, viewers can perceive this either as poking fun on the poor souls who suffer the consequences of breaking the taboos, or as flouting the taboos themselves.

The ritual taboo-breaking that is a usual counterpart of ribaldry underlies its controversial nature and explains why ribaldry is frequently a subject of censorship. Ribaldry, whose usual aim is not “merely” to be sexually stimulating, often does address larger concerns than mere sexual appetite. However, being presented in the form of comedy, these larger concerns seem to censors to be un-serious. Moreover, the presence of satirical content in ribaldry tends to arouse the wrath of authorities, who may overlook more explicit sexual entertainments in order to prosecute comedians whom they perceive as attacking conventions they wish to maintain.

Etymology of Ribaldry

The word ribald was originally a noun and referred to a military unit found in French and Italian armies in the Middle Ages. Ribalds, led by their “king”, were vagrants or other lower-class members of society, who fought with little or no clothing, and whose main objective seems to have been to expose themselves to the enemy in order to disgust or shame them. They were usually massacred by the enemy, but they were considered an expendable unit, to be used before the real battle began. They were also in charge of any prostitutes following an army, and were responsible for pillaging enemy camps. By the 16th century, the more familiar definition of “ribald” had developed, to the dismay of those who remembered them as a respected military unit.

From a sneaky Wikizen

Also tagged ,

Heroic Wikipedia vs Encyclopedia Britannica


The WSJ hosts an interesting interview between Jim Wales, founder of Wikipedia and the chief editor of Encyclopedia Britannica. Lookout for the tirade against sneaky links, the value of selectivity and the hazards of impulsive editing.

Also tagged

What’s The Status Of Women In Japan Today?


From Steven McCarty’s Japancasting blog,

After a regular presentation on “Japanese People and Society” (check out the earlier podcast) for the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), participants from India, Vietnam and Guatemala had questions on the role of women and religion in Japan, past and present. The 28-minute discussion was recorded with an MP3 format digital voice recorder (smaller than an iPod Shuffle).

Contrary to the sights and sounds seen in Japanese popular culture exported abroad, being a regular woman in Japan can be a stifling experience as Japan before the end of World War 2 and decades after that still holds on to its heavily patriarchcal social structure and strict expectations of gender roles.

What has changed today and what remains the same? Listen to the podcast to find out.

Also tagged

 


 


J-List